Our Appellate And Published Decisions

Biancalana v. T. D. Service Company (2013) 56 Cal.4th 807 (published) (California Supreme Court held that a trustee may set aside and correct a foreclosure sale due to an error in its processing.)

Bae v. T.D. Service Company (2016) 245 Cal.App.4th 89 (published) (Court of appeal confirmed that a declaration of nonmonetary status remains in force despite the filing of an amended complaint.)

Boyce v. T.D. Service Company (2015) 235 Cal.App.4th 429 (published) (California Court of Appeal confirmed that the processing of a foreclosure does not give rise to a slander of title claim.)

First Nationwide Savings v. Perry (1992) 11 Cal.App.4th 1657 (published) (Court of Appeal confirmed that mistakenly reconveyed trust deed could be enforced on the theory of unjust enrichment.)

Fountain Valley Chateau Blanc Mgmt. v. Cunningham (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 743 (published) (Court of Appeal held that homeowner could bring action against his HOA for invasion of privacy and breach of the CC&R’s.)

Goffney v. Family Savings & Loan Assn. (2002) 81 Cal.App.4th 1775 (since decertified for publication) (Court of Appeal confirmed the validity of foreclosure where borrower contested timing of the sale.)

Millennium Rock v. T.D. Service Co. (2010) 81 Cal.App.4th 1775 (published) (Court of Appeal confirmed that error by auctioneer justified cancellation and re-holding of foreclosure sale.)

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Continental Development Corp. (1997) 6 Cal.4th 694 (published) (Court of Appeal confirmed eminent domain condemnation award for over $1.1 million in damages.)

Blakeley v. Castillo (2010) 2010 WL 1718956 (not certified for publication) (Court of Appeal confirmed dismissal of plaintiff’s action due to failure to comply with court order concerning lot-split of real property.)

Dennis v. Stanhope (2008) 2008 WL 4560100 (not certified for publication) (Court of Appeal confirmed judgment rescinding agreement for purchase of real property based upon misrepresentation by sellers and existence of prior purchase agreement with tenant.)

Castaneda v. Saxon Mortgage Services (2009) 687 F.Supp.2d 1191 (published) (Court of Appeal confirmed that lender did not owe duties to borrower in the foreclosure process.)

Keen v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (2009) 664 F.Supp.2d 1086 (published) (Court dismissed plaintiff’s action for violation of truth in lending act, RESPA, and state and federal fair debt collection practices acts for failure to state a valid claim.)

Gardner v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (2010) 691 F.Supp.2d 1192 (published) (Court dismissed plaintiff’s action for unfair debt collection practices, violation of RESPA, fraud, unfair competition and wrongful foreclosure.)

Contact Us For Help With Your Real Estate Law Issue

To find out how The Dreyfuss Firm, PLC, can help you with your real estate issue, call our Irvine, California, office at 949-727-0977 and speak with a lawyer. Or fill out our online contact form and we will contact you. Serving Orange County and Southern California for over 35 years.